You must really like to help all members after the way myspace has treated you in the past, I’m surprised you’re still here. Thanx a lot.
]]>I dropped him a message thanking him for passing my info along to Tom.
]]>“Actually, most of them are significantly more qualified than you are”
I find it hard to believe that “most of them” not only have the odd mix of knowledge I do but are also “significantly more qualified”. The current state of MySpace security as a whole speaks volumes. And, if you are right: management should be ashamed of themselves for not allowing those ninjas to be effective.
“The problem then, is with support on the development end of things.”
Have you paid any attention to the new features rolled out by MySpace? The code monkeys they have now are overflowing with talent. Sounds like the security team just needs better access to them…
“They need about five more developers thrown into the mix with a couple actually assigned to their team”
You sure seem to know a lot about their specific needs…
“I’m going to suggest that what that the team needs is not another…”
You might want to read the job advert for the gig I was going for. It wasn’t a coding position, Smarty Pants.
“arrogant, demeaning person”
You obviously haven’t gotten past the surface with me. I HATE nothing more than elitist snobs. I’m also a realist and call stuff as I see it though.
“I assume you quickly discovered that Sarah K. is the Director of Policy Enforcement”
Yeah, I saw that. And, nothing I said here was specifically negative towards her. If you find the term “chick” to be demeaning, you really need to lighten up.
“1. You’re not special…”
You calling my momma a liar? lolz
“alienated them with your misunderstanding of corporate structures”
Everything you’re saying makes it sound as if you have the inside scoop on a bunch of talented people being held back from being effective at their jobs by management. I don’t have any inside perspective on this so I simply don’t know if that’s the case. If it is, I hope my “not so special” / “vocal” ass at least shakes things up a bit for the benefit of the rank and file people.
The problem then, is with support on the development end of things.
I’m going to suggest that what that the team needs is not another smartass with good ideas that may or may not be an arrogant, demeaning person who at face value, looks completely incapable of working within a team structure. They need about five more developers thrown into the mix with a couple actually assigned to their team. Yeah, you can explain shit to coders? Greeeat. Woo hoo.
If you don’t get the job, this is probably why:
1. You’re not that special. Your ideas are not that special and your findings are not that special. You’re just vocal.
2. You made a shitty impression. Oh, people heard you. I don’t suspect you go into job interviews with a holier-than-thou attitude, though. Because the way people get away with a superiority complex on a job application is to make sure that #1 does not actually apply to them.
Oh, and since you know how to use Google, I assume you quickly discovered that Sarah K. is the Director of Policy Enforcement, and dismissed her as “some chick” anyway. If you get that far, I wonder if you’ll talk to her that way during your interview?
]]>